Arrovian Impossibilities in Aggregating Preferences over Sets
نویسنده
چکیده
Given a society confronting a set of alternatives A, we consider the aggregation of individual preferences over the power set A of A into a social preference over A. In case we allow individuals to have any complete and transitive preference over A, Arrow’s impossibility theorem naturally applies. However, the Arrovian impossibility prevails, even when the set of admissible preferences over A is severely restricted by strong axioms that relate preferences over A to preferences over A. In fact, we identify a very narrow domain of lexicographic orderings over A which exhibits the Arrovian impossibility in all of its superdomains. As the lexicographic extension we use is compatible with almost all standard extension axioms, we interpret our results as the strong prevalence of Arrow’s impossibility theorem in aggregating preferences over sets. * Department of Economics, İstanbul Bilgi University
منابع مشابه
Aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean preferences: Arrovian impossibility results
Cerreia-Vioglio, Ghirardato, Maccheroni, Marinacci and Siniscalchi (Economic Theory, 48:341–375, 2011) have recently proposed a very general axiomatisation of preferences in the presence of ambiguity, viz. Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean (MBA) preference orderings. This paper investigates the problem of Arrovian aggregation of such preferences — and proves dictatorial impossibility results fo...
متن کاملAggregating Moral Preferences
Preference-aggregation problems arise in various contexts. One such context, little explored by social choice theorists, is metaethical. ‘Idealadvisor’ accounts, which have played a major role in metaethics, propose that moral facts are constituted by the idealized preferences of a community of advisors. Such accounts give rise to a preference-aggregation problem: namely, aggregating the adviso...
متن کاملArrovian Aggregation of Convex Preferences and Pairwise Utilitarianism
We consider social welfare functions that satisfy Arrow’s classic axioms of independence of irrelevant alternatives and Pareto optimality when the outcome space is the convex hull over some finite set of alternatives. Individual and collective preferences are assumed to be continuous and convex, which guarantees the existence of maximal elements and the consistency of choice functions that retu...
متن کاملArrow theorems in the fuzzy setting
Throughout this paper, our main idea is to analyze the Arrovian approach in a fuzzy context, paying attention to different extensions of the classical Arrow's model arising in mathematical Social Choice to aggregate preferences that the agents define on a set of alternatives. There is a wide set of extensions. Some of them give rise to an impossibility theorem as in the Arrovian classical mod...
متن کاملDraft – March 13 , 2017 Arrovian Aggregation via Pairwise Utilitarianism
We consider Arrovian aggregation of preferences over lotteries that are represented by skew-symmetric bilinear (SSB) utility functions, a significant generalization of von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions due to Fishburn, in which utility is assigned to pairs of alternatives. We show that the largest domain of preferences that simultaneously allows for independence of irrelevant alternativ...
متن کامل